That hasn't even worked for something with consequences as severe as climate change, let alone Adobe's vendor lock-in on Photoshop. You can't burden them with problems in the hope of guilt-tripping them into "but society would be so much better in the coming decades if you ignored your problems". It's just ignoring reality.įinally, customers (at least retail ones) aren't investors or policymakers - they're just customers. Expecting customers to ignore their very real and actual problems and pay for a non-solution just because HNers prefer them to (calling them "sunk costs" or whatever, as you can see in sibling threads), is realistically not possible either. Second, "realistically it's not possible" applies just as well for the flip side. But it's not like this is out of humanity's reach or something. It takes a ton of talent, investment, and dedication, sure. People have accomplished incredible feats of reverse engineering (arguably much harder ones) even in the open-source world - with hardly any compensation. Then how do they expect anything to change?įirst, "realistically it's not possible" isn't obviously true on its face. ![]() ![]() users are not wrong in requiring impeccable PSD compatibility from other software and can call actual reasons, but realistically it's not possible.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |